Speaker Mike Johnson Drops Epstein List Surprise On Democrats – They W…

Johnson Slams Democrats’ Epstein Push As Risky, Political

Tuesday, at the weekly House Republican Leadership press conference, Speaker Mike Johnson discussed House Republicans’ efforts to deliver maximum transparency regarding the Epstein files and ensure justice for victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes.

Speaker Johnson also addressed what he called Democrats’ newfound interest in the Epstein files, despite the information being in the government’s possession throughout the Biden Administration.

“The truth is, the biggest proponents of this discharge petition were never actually interested in transparency or ensuring justice or protecting victims of this unspeakable tragedy, the Epstein evils. And how do we know that? Because the Democrats had every one of the Epstein files in their possession for the four long years of the Biden Administration,” Speaker Johnson said. “The Biden Department of Justice had the files the entire time, and not a single one of the people who were so loud and animated right now ever said anything about it for all those four years.”

“For four long years under the previous administration of the Biden-Harris Administration, Democrats insisted there was no border crisis. Remember, they told you that that wasn’t a problem at all. They dismissed inflation as transitory. That’s what they told us. They told the American people not to believe what we could all see with our own eyes, that there was an obvious mental and physical decline on the part of President Biden individually,” Johnson said. “And now, seemingly overnight, these same cast of characters, they’ve taken a sudden and urgent interest in the Epstein investigation.”

“None of them held press conferences. None of them demanded the release of the documents. And under Biden’s DOJ, when they prosecuted just Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, not a single one of these Democrats or any of the proponents of the discharge ever made any noise about that at all,” he said. “So, it’s fair for the American people to ask the question, why now? Why suddenly are they so interested?”

Johnson said Republicans are “working in earnest to deliver transparency to the American people” while ensuring that victims are not harmed.

“This was an unspeakable tragedy, and we have great compassion for the victims,” Johnson said. “They deserve justice. It has been too long delayed.”

Johnson highlighted the House Oversight Committee’s ongoing bipartisan work, noting that it has already released more material than the discharge petition requests.

“So far, by last count, it’s over 65,000 documents, Epstein files documents, that are now out in the public for everyone to review,” Johnson said. “That includes tens of thousands of pages from the Epstein Estate. And that includes Epstein’s flight logs, his personal financial records and ledgers, his daily calendars, and so much more.”

Johnson said the discharge petition lacks several protections, including victim privacy safeguards, citing court concerns and a victim letter urging the court to ensure that identifying details remain redacted.

He also warned that releasing unverified or non-credible material could “ruin the reputations of completely innocent people” whose names appear in the files but who had no involvement in Epstein’s crimes.

Johnson said the petition inadvertently cites the wrong section of federal law, which he argued could force the release of child sexual abuse materials by preventing adequate redactions.

He also said the measure risks exposing whistleblowers, confidential informants, and undercover law enforcement officers whose identities were promised confidentiality.

“Imagine the chilling effect that that would have on future investigations,” Johnson said.

Finally, Johnson said the petition raises national security concerns by compelling broad declassification within a set timeframe.

“This ignores the principle that declassification should always rest and always has rested with the agency that originated the intelligence,” he said.

Related Posts

He Told Me to Stay Away After I Got Hurt So I Stepped Back… and Their House Deal Fell Apart Overnight

I didn’t think she’d actually hit me. Not my daughter-in-law Ellie. Not the woman I had helped through nursing school and allowed to live in my guesthouse…

She Mocked My Uniform Until She Learned I Owned The House

The turkey was still steaming when my mother decided to carve into me instead. Thanksgiving at the Vale house always looked perfect from the outside. My parents…

My Daughter-in-Law Tried to Give My Lake Cabin to Her Parents Then I Opened the Folder on the Porch

The Lake Cabin I had been retired for less than forty-eight hours when my daughter-in-law decided my new lake cabin was no longer mine. She never said…

My Son Stopped Me at My Granddaughter’s Wedding and Said I Wasn’t on the Guest List, So I Quietly Called My Lawyer

The Folder My lawyer’s name is Robert Chen, and he has been my lawyer for twenty-two years. The morning after my granddaughter Rachel’s wedding, I called him…

I Pulled a Mysterious Suitcase From the Lake After My Daughter-in-Law Left, and What Was Hidden Inside Changed Everything

That October afternoon at Meridian Lake had started like any other. I sat on the porch of the old Oregon house where I had raised my only…

63 Acres of Land with Lodge, Pond, and Hunting Opportunities

This 62.55-acre property in Freeport, Ohio, combines wooded land, open fields, and a comfortable lodge-style home. Built in 1998, the residence has five bedrooms and three bathrooms,…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *