In a bold and unexpected move, former judge and Fox News personality Jeanine Pirro has been appointed as interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, replacing Ed Martin. Her appointment by President Donald J. Trump—amid ongoing investigations involving former FBI Director James Comey—has raised eyebrows across legal and political circles.
Pirro, a longtime ally of Trump and vocal critic of Comey, now leads the federal office with jurisdiction over high-profile public integrity cases. Among the most controversial issues on her desk is whether to bring criminal charges against Comey for a cryptic social media post that some interpreted as a veiled threat toward the former president.
The “8647” Post
In early May, Comey posted an image to social media with the caption “8647”—a number that online communities have speculated to mean “86 Trump (47th president).” The post quickly gained attention, with critics claiming it could be interpreted as inciting violence or threatening the former president. Supporters of Comey defended the post as satirical or symbolic free speech.
The post triggered a preliminary investigation by the Secret Service, who reportedly contacted Comey for a routine “protective intelligence” interview. As of this writing, Comey has not been charged with any crime, nor has he made a public statement regarding the investigation.
A New Sheriff in Town
Pirro’s appointment adds a fresh layer of political complexity. Known for her fiery rhetoric and tough-on-crime reputation, Pirro served for years as a district attorney and judge in Westchester County, New York. She later transitioned into national media, where she became one of Trump’s most vocal defenders.
While U.S. Attorney appointments typically go through Senate confirmation, Pirro has assumed the role in an interim capacity. Her placement is legal under the Vacancies Reform Act, though some legal experts have questioned whether her close relationship with Trump may compromise the appearance of impartiality.
“This is a deeply political moment for an office that’s supposed to function independently,” said Professor Alton McKeever of Georgetown Law. “If any charges are brought against a high-profile political opponent, such as Comey, there will undoubtedly be allegations of retaliation.”
A Decision with Consequences
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for D.C. is responsible for prosecuting both federal and local crimes and is often involved in matters with national implications. Under Pirro’s leadership, the office is now reviewing the Secret Service’s findings related to Comey’s post and weighing whether to move forward with criminal prosecution.
Insiders suggest that Pirro is personally reviewing evidence and weighing the legal basis for any potential charge, including whether the post constitutes a credible threat under federal law. The legal threshold for prosecuting speech, especially political speech, is high.
“The line between protected speech and criminal threat is very narrow, especially when dealing with public figures,” said former federal prosecutor Nadia Sayeed. “Unless there is clear evidence of intent and a perceived threat, it’s unlikely a jury would convict.”
Political Tensions High
Critics argue that pursuing charges against Comey would be perceived as politically motivated, especially given the long-standing tensions between Trump and the former FBI director. Comey played a central role in the 2016 investigations into both Hillary Clinton’s emails and alleged Russian interference in the election, which many Trump supporters still view as part of a “deep state” campaign.
For now, Pirro has not announced any formal charges, and it remains unclear how aggressively she will pursue the case. But her appointment and immediate focus on the Comey matter has already polarized opinion in Washington.
As the situation develops, legal experts and political commentators alike will be watching closely. The outcome could have lasting implications for how future administrations handle politically charged investigations—and how justice is perceived in the eyes of the public.
Written by Staff Correspondent | The Capitol Times
WATCH THE VIDEO:
