As Trump Makes Historic Middle East Peace, Kamala Opens Her Mouth To Remind Us What We Dodged
No matter your political leanings, sometimes you’ve got to give credit where it’s due — and this is one of those times. After President Trump announced last Wednesday that Israel and Hamas had agreed to the first phase of a peace plan — one that includes returning the remaining surviving hostages — even some of his critics were forced to acknowledge the significance of the moment.
It’s a rare example of decisive leadership actually producing results in a region where diplomacy has too often meant endless talk and zero progress.
“This means that ALL of the Hostages will be released very soon, and Israel will withdraw their Troops to an agreed upon line as the first steps toward a Strong, Durable, and Everlasting Peace,” he wrote on his Truth Social page at the time.
We couldn’t believe that even twice-failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton praised the president, putting aside her TDS for a few minutes to note that “I really commend President Trump and his administration,” adding “Let’s now support this process and bring it together, not just in a nonpartisan way in our own country, but literally internationally as a great global commitment to try to bring peace, security, stability and a better future to the Middle East.”
When former Vice President Kamala Harris was asked over the weekend whether President Trump deserved credit for the Israel-Hamas peace deal, she could barely contain herself. Through gritted teeth, she delivered a meandering, word-salad response that somehow managed to dodge mentioning Trump’s name entirely.
“I commend the people who have been a part of this process. I commend the Qataris, the Egyptians, and the president,” she said.
Then, of course, Harris: “I really do hope it becomes real, and that the hostages are out, that Gaza is no longer being treated with such brutality of force, that aid goes in.”
MSNBC’s The Weekend host Eugene Daniels decided to toss former Vice President Kamala Harris a softball disguised as a “genocide” question, asking whether she believed what happened in Gaza fit that description.
Her response was stunning — and not in a good way. For someone reportedly eyeing another presidential run in 2028, Harris sounded like she was reading straight from a far-left activist pamphlet, complete with the usual buzzwords and zero substance. It was pure, fact-free rhetoric — and all while President Trump was literally en route overseas to participate in the very peace ceremonies she was trying to spin:
“I think that, listen, it is a term of law that a court will decide. But I will tell you that when you look at the number of children that have been killed, the number of innocent civilians that have been killed, the refusal to give aid and support, we should all step back and ask this question and be honest about it, yeah.”
It was, as many were quick to note, a stark reminder of the disaster America narrowly avoided by rejecting Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign, per Washington Times columnist Tim Murtaugh:
There can be no doubt that if Kamala Harris were somehow president today, the world would be a far more violent place because she would never stand up to evil. She sees the bad guys as the good guys, and vice versa.
The planet really escaped catastrophe when Trump beat her.
Also conveniently omitted from the “interview” was any acknowledgment of how Hamas would treat Jewish people — including Harris’s own husband, Doug Emhoff — or someone like Eugene Daniels, who is openly gay. That kind of moral blindness speaks volumes.
Let’s be honest: if Kamala Harris had ever made it to the Oval Office, none of this progress would be happening — not now, not ever. The Middle East would still be mired in chaos, and America would be back to leading from behind.
Thankfully, the right leader is in the right place at the right time. On a historic day like this, every American — regardless of politics — should be grateful for that. Imagine how many lives Trump has helped save.
